Solid effort by the Reds last night.
Plays
205p White Sox +140 2x
440p SD/SEA o9 +108 2x
Leans
705p WAS (Zimmermann) +112 vs. BOS (Smoltz)
710p ATL (Lowe) -101 vs. NYY (Pettitte)
940p ARZ (Garland) +100 vs. TEX (Feldman)
Streak for the Cash
930a A. Roddick/T. Kunitsyn u3.5 sets
103p L. Glover over V. Singh
Current Streak: 2
I was set to take Mahan, but then I checked the sets betting at Pinny and Roddick is -248 to win 3-0. Easy enough.
I think Vijay is the right play this afternoon (according to Bodog), but I'll await Saw approval on that play. Nothing else is remotely appealing.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I was wondering if you've read this article over at SI:
http://sportsinsights.com/sportsbettingresearch/betagainst/mlb_betting_statistics_2009.aspx
And what your thoughts are on that seemingly HUGE home/away "split" in terms of profit. Have you ever run a split like this on your own plays, and do you think there's anything to playing home anti-pub teams ONLY?
Good luck.
I think Glover is way to go. They are pretty equal, but you are getting the tie with Glover.
That Lemmy keeps getting more prestigious:
http://awfulannouncing.blogspot.com/2009/06/shaq-learns-hes-traded-via-twitter.html
And what your thoughts are on that seemingly HUGE home/away "split" in terms of profit. Have you ever run a split like this on your own plays, and do you think there's anything to playing home anti-pub teams ONLY?
I briefly looked at it here and here. I do believe there is something to contrarian home teams being more profitable than road teams. I don't have the time to do a more robust analysis than what I have there, at least not until cajuncook gets me some data (Ahem.).
Post a Comment