I suppose that's just the way baseball is going to be.
Leans
705p PIT (Ohlendorf) +106 @ NYM (Pelfrey)
705p TEX (Feldman) +161 @ NYY (Pettitte)
705p KC (Bannister) +134 @ TB (Niemann)
710p ATL (Lowe) -130 vs. CHC (Lilly)
810p OAK (Outman) +120 @ CHW (Richard)
815p CIN (Cueto) +122 @ STL (Lohse)
1005p SD (Young) -112 vs. PHL (Cueto)
1010p ARZ (Garland) +180 @ LAD (Billingsley)
1010p BAL (Bergsen) +113 @ SEA (Vargas)
Regardless of last night's post, Oakland stood out to me this morning.
Streak for the Cash
8a S. Kuznetsova over S. Williams
Current Streak: 0
The Ruskie is a very small dog to Serena, but you have to imagine Serena's line is inflated. I went with this instead of the Federer under, which is marginally better, because I want to play something this afternoon (which will be NED w/d) and don't want to get burned like I did yesterday.
4 comments:
No Nats??
"No Nats??"
I echo this question.
I echo this question.
I think it's pretty clear that I am mind flipped on the Nats right now. Assuming the previous post is incorrect, I still need a break from them from a sanity standpoint.
And yes, I know this is a square answer. I'm ok with being a square about them for a few days.
Earlier, I thought about pointing out you listed Cueto as pitching for the Phils tonight. Then I noticed this evening SIA is listing the Phils pitcher as J Napp.
Apparently, JA Happ has some work to do before he's better known. Not that it's affecting the # of bets on him at SIA.
Post a Comment