This is dumb.
730p Cincinnati +6.5 +105 2x
I mean, really dumb.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Search
Popular Posts
-
Now that the philosophy of sports gambling * has been laid out, you are going to need to know how to employ the strategy. Essentially, this ...
-
Before the conference tournaments, I posted the log5 predictions for each of the eight majors . These are the probabilities of each team ad... -
Well, I went ahead and downloaded Minitab so I could do some ARIMA modeling of my data. I have to admit, the preliminary results are a littl... -
One of the things I plan to do while I'm not gambling is... read about gambling. Sports gambling has taken a more academic flavor over t...
-
West Virginia clearly took a step back last year. There's no reason to think that the Mountaineers won't fall back to their historic... -
I like late 90s SNL way too much. Thank you, ESPN, for making people in their late 20s and early 30s happy tonight. Youngsters, reference he... -
This is the best link I can find. Does anyone have anything better? I know about the SBR converter, but it is seriously flawed. I'd rat...
-
Sorry for not putting the normal Wednesday-type post yesterday. Personal things came up. The schedule for tonight's posts: A look at how...
-
From ESPN : Since Markell signed a bill to reauthorize sports betting in his state this past May, the style of betting has been up for debat...
-
I'd write more, but well, it's 5:30 AM and Moneyline already covered everything here . Anyway, go sign up.
4 comments:
We all know this is a loser, my mindset is all wrong for NFLX.
I don't care if it hit, you're still a degenerate for betting on exhibition games.
I don't see anyone arguing your point
"I don't see anyone arguing your point"
It is always interesting to see where people draw the line though.
In this case: 400 baseball plays < 3 NFLX plays.
Post a Comment