Read the 7th paragraph, asshat.
Be back tomorrow.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Search
Popular Posts
-
Now that the philosophy of sports gambling * has been laid out, you are going to need to know how to employ the strategy. Essentially, this ...
-
Before the conference tournaments, I posted the log5 predictions for each of the eight majors . These are the probabilities of each team ad... -
Well, I went ahead and downloaded Minitab so I could do some ARIMA modeling of my data. I have to admit, the preliminary results are a littl... -
One of the things I plan to do while I'm not gambling is... read about gambling. Sports gambling has taken a more academic flavor over t...
-
West Virginia clearly took a step back last year. There's no reason to think that the Mountaineers won't fall back to their historic... -
I like late 90s SNL way too much. Thank you, ESPN, for making people in their late 20s and early 30s happy tonight. Youngsters, reference he... -
This is the best link I can find. Does anyone have anything better? I know about the SBR converter, but it is seriously flawed. I'd rat...
-
Sorry for not putting the normal Wednesday-type post yesterday. Personal things came up. The schedule for tonight's posts: A look at how...
-
From ESPN : Since Markell signed a bill to reauthorize sports betting in his state this past May, the style of betting has been up for debat...
-
I'd write more, but well, it's 5:30 AM and Moneyline already covered everything here . Anyway, go sign up.
6 comments:
Sorry man -- your math and writing skills are clearly better than mine.
I'll try to be more clear:
Your "Play Early" column has a total of "59-53-3". I count 59-52-3.
Is that the "Early Saturday hangover state" from that paragraph?
And to be clear so as to save you another asshat post:
I get that you added plays. But you list them as being 7-12-2. Can't wrap my head around why "Play Close" differs by eight (3-5) and "Play Early" by one (0-1).
Apologies in advance for paying too much attention to your numbers.
Dalke,
I'm hammered right now, but just to let you know, this post had nothing to do with you.
When I (less? more?) drunkenly counted, the 7th paragraph had the line about not playing games that weren't on my leans list.
Also, there is a very clear error with one of the records in the Wednesday post that I never bothered to correct. I always see it at work where I can't correct it and forget about it when I get home
Copy that.
I'm with you (I think). You mention that you added 21 plays (7-12-2), but I only count 9 (3-6) different from the plays to their totals. Either way, the percentages (for those 2+ point moves) are really high and it's interesting to see how infrequent the line moves come close to the final score.
That said, it's way too late/early to do math. And I'm happy to play the asshat role anytime...
I'm with you (I think). You mention that you added 21 plays (7-12-2), but I only count 9 (3-6) different from the plays to their totals.
I got 7-12-2 by subtracting 61-52-2 from 68-64-4 (my posted record).
Post a Comment