tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20098524.post8859126024516484238..comments2023-07-14T07:50:35.876-04:00Comments on You guessed it, Frank Stallone: Wednesday 5/6Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20098524.post-91266300954316318912009-05-06T18:51:00.000-04:002009-05-06T18:51:00.000-04:00"At least the books put up a number that isn't inc...<I>"At least the books put up a number that isn't incredibly ugly to the naked eye on the Nats game for once"?</I><BR><BR>Precisely.am19psuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18441351103470970374noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20098524.post-40282039332807874082009-05-06T18:48:00.000-04:002009-05-06T18:48:00.000-04:00"Is it 2003 and someone forgot to tell me? How is ..."Is it 2003 and someone forgot to tell me? How is Mike Hampton only +136 against the freaking Cubs?"<br /><br />Because he's never been particularly bad when he's actually been on the mound? I don't even know what this means, really.<br /><br />"At least the books put up a close-to-fair number on the Nats game for once."<br /><br />Neither does this. Are you trying to say, "At least the books put up a number that isn't incredibly ugly to the naked eye on the Nats game for once"? Or do you know what the fair number is and you're just keeping it to yourself?Vegas Watchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02353166004125421683noreply@blogger.com